This post contains affiliate links. We may earn a small commission when you buy through our links — at no extra cost to you.
Many running shorts marketed as ‘performance’ are actually better suited for the gym or lounging. Cotton blends trap sweat, compression shorts ride up, and pockets often fail to hold a phone steady during a stride. The gap between marketing and lived use is wide.
This guide focuses on what matters: moisture-wicking fabric, secure pocket design, and a fit that stays in place. Whether you prefer a traditional loose short with a liner or a biker-style compression short, the right pair exists — you just need to know which specs to prioritize.
The best shorts for you depend on your inseam preference, whether you need tummy control, and how much phone storage matters. Most runners find that a mid-range price around $20 delivers the best balance of performance and comfort.
Best for Loose Short Liner
UA Play Up 3.0
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 3.5"
- Moisture-Wicking: Yes
- Pocket Design: 2 side drop-in
- Liner or Compression: Built-in brief
- Waistband Type: Elastic mid-rise
- Price: $$
The Under Armour Play Up 3.0 uses a lightweight polyester-elastane blend that wicks moisture and breathes well in heat. The built-in brief liner keeps the shorts from riding up during runs, and the side drop-in pockets hold a phone securely. This combination makes it a practical choice for runners who prefer a traditional loose short that stays put.
Best for women between 5’2" and 5’7" who want a classic fit with a built-in liner. The 3.5-inch inseam is short—those needing more coverage may prefer a longer option. Note that the shorts fit generously; many find ordering one size down gives a better fit. The fabric also works for gym sessions and casual wear, adding to its everyday utility.
Pros
- Fabric stays cool and breathable during hot runs.
- Built-in liner prevents ride-up, keeping shorts in place.
- Side pockets securely hold phone while running.
Cons
- Approximate 3.5-inch inseam offers less coverage than longer shorts—may not suit those wanting more thigh coverage.
For runners who want a dependable loose short with a liner and pockets, the Play Up 3.0 delivers without the fuss.
Best for Compression Pockets
IUGA High-Waist 6" Biker
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 6"
- Moisture-Wicking: No
- Pocket Design: 2 side drop-in
- Liner or Compression: Compression (no liner)
- Waistband Type: High waist, tummy control
- Price: $
The IUGA Biker Shorts deliver thick fabric that stays opaque during movement and deep side pockets that hold a phone securely without sagging. The high-waist tummy control panel smooths the midsection, and the compressive fit prevents ride-up during runs. For runners who prefer a looser feel, the tight compression can feel restrictive. The 6-inch inseam is a standard length, but taller runners may find it too short. This pair works best for those prioritizing pocket security and compression over traditional loose-fit running shorts.
Pros
- Deep phone pockets lie flat and stay secure during activity
- Thick fabric passes squat test with no sheerness
- Effective tummy control panel holds midsection smoothly
Cons
- Compression fit may feel too restrictive if you prefer loose shorts
- 6-inch inseam may be short for runners over 5’9"
For runners who want secure pockets and tummy control in a compression fit, these shorts offer premium features at a budget-friendly price.
Best for Lululemon Dupe
CRZ Dolphin 3"
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 3"
- Moisture-Wicking: Yes
- Pocket Design: 1 zip back pocket
- Liner or Compression: Built-in compression shorts
- Waistband Type: High waist
- Price: $$
These 3” shorts mirror the Lululemon Hotty Hot cut and quick-dry fabric at roughly half the price. The single zip pocket secures cards and keys but won’t accommodate a phone — a clear tradeoff versus the top pick’s side pockets. This style is best for runners with a slim build who prefer a very short inseam and don’t need on-phone access.
Pros
- Close match to Lululemon Hotty Hot in cut and fabric quality.
- Zip pocket keeps keys and cards secure during runs.
- Quick-dry fabric handles sweat and light rain effectively.
Cons
- Sizing runs smaller than typical – ordering up may be necessary for a proper fit.
A faithful Lululemon-style short at half the cost – ideal for runners who value style and a secure key pocket over phone storage.
Best for 2-In-1 Pockets
Stelle 2-in-1
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 4" / 6" liner
- Moisture-Wicking: Yes
- Pocket Design: 2 zippered (outer+liner)
- Liner or Compression: Built-in compression shorts
- Waistband Type: High waist, wide elastic
- Price: $$
Where the top pick offers a classic loose cut, the Stelle 2-in-1 integrates a compression liner with a drop-in phone pocket inside plus a zippered outer pocket — giving you four storage options without the outer shorts riding up. This setup works well for runners who want on-body phone storage and dislike loose shorts shifting. However, the inner liner may shift on longer runs, and the product is still building its long-term track record, so those needing proven multi-year durability may prefer the more established alternative.
Pros
- Four pockets: two zippered and two drop-in, including a liner pocket that securely holds a phone.
- Outer shorts stay in place during activity with no ride-up.
Cons
- On longer runs, the inner liner may shift slightly.
A strong choice for runners who prioritize pocket access and a secure, stay-put fit at a mid-range price.
Best for Multi-Pack Travel
Liberty 5-Pack
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 5"
- Moisture-Wicking: Yes
- Pocket Design: 2 zippered pockets
- Liner or Compression: None (loose fit)
- Waistband Type: Elastic with drawstring
- Price: $$
These shorts offer solid value if you need several pairs for lounging, errands, or light walks. The zippered pockets keep keys and cards secure, and the lightweight polyester fabric breathes well in hot weather. But the fit runs roomy — the elastic waistband can feel baggy — and the pockets are shallow enough that larger phones may poke out. That makes them a practical choice for travelers wanting multiple pairs, not for runners who need a snug, stay-put fit.
Pros
- 5-pack at low per-pair cost
- Zippered pockets secure small valuables
- Lightweight and breathable for hot weather
Cons
- Elastic waistband can feel baggy — not ideal for active movement
- Pockets may be too shallow for large smartphones
Buy these if you want an affordable set of shorts for casual days and light activity. For running, look to the top pick with a built-in liner and deeper pockets.
Best for Yoga Low-Impact
CRZ ButterLuxe 6"
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 6"
- Moisture-Wicking: No
- Liner or Compression: Compression (no liner)
- Waistband Type: High waist
- Price: $$
With a fabric often described as silk-like, the CRZ YOGA ButterLuxe 6” shorts deliver exceptional softness and stretch for low-impact activities like yoga and pilates. Unlike the top pick Under Armour Play Up 3.0, these have no pockets and the seamless cut may fit tightly on wider hips. They stay put during gentle movement but aren’t suited for running, where phone storage and moisture management matter more.
Pros
- Buttery-soft fabric feels comfortable against skin, similar to premium brands
- Excellent stretch allows full range of motion in yoga and pilates
- High waist stays in place during low-impact movement without riding up
Cons
- No pockets – cannot carry a phone or keys while active
- Seamless design may fit snugly on hips for some body shapes
These shorts are a strong choice for yoga and lounging when softness is the priority and pockets aren’t needed.
Best for Tall Runners
baleaf Biker 3-8"
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 3"/5"/8"
- Moisture-Wicking: No
- Pocket Design: 2 side drop-in
- Liner or Compression: Compression (no liner)
- Waistband Type: High waist
- Price: $
The baleaf biker shorts offer three inseam lengths (3", 5", 8") at a budget price, with soft fabric and functional side pockets that hold phones well. However, sizing can run significantly small, making it necessary to order 1–2 sizes up—a limitation that undermines reliability for consistent athletic use.
Pros
- Wide range of inseam lengths (3", 5", 8") to suit different heights and preferences.
- Soft, buttery fabric with well-placed side pockets for phone storage.
Cons
- Sizing can run significantly small, necessitating ordering 1–2 sizes up for a proper fit.
A budget-friendly option for tall runners who need specific inseam lengths and are prepared to handle sizing quirks.
Best for Tummy Control
GYM PEOPLE High-Waist
Key Features
- Inseam Length: Mid-thigh
- Moisture-Wicking: No
- Pocket Design: 2 deep side pockets
- Liner or Compression: Compression (no liner)
- Waistband Type: High waist, tummy control
- Price: $$
These shorts deliver strong tummy control and deep phone pockets at a mid-range price. The stretchy fabric feels comfortable, but the legs can ride up during running, making them better suited for gym workouts with minimal running. Some colors may feel thin, and camel toe is possible depending on body shape.
Pros
- Deep pockets securely hold large phones during wear.
- Tummy control panel smooths the midsection effectively.
Cons
- During running, the legs may ride up and require adjustment — fine for gym workouts with minimal running.
Best for gym workouts where tummy control and pocket access matter more than staying put during runs.
Best for Brand Loyalty
Nike Tempo
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 3.5"
- Moisture-Wicking: Yes
- Pocket Design: Small back zip pocket
- Liner or Compression: Built-in brief
- Waistband Type: Elastic mid-rise
- Price: $$$
Nike’s Dri-FIT shorts offer effective moisture-wicking and a classic built-in liner, appealing to brand-loyal runners. While the small back zip pocket won’t hold a phone and the price is premium, the moisture management and comfortable fit still suit runners who don’t need phone storage.
Pros
- Effective Dri-FIT moisture management keeps you dry during runs.
- Classic running short with built-in liner for comfort and coverage.
Cons
- Lighter color options may appear see-through during movement – darker shades are recommended for outdoor running.
Best for Nike loyalists who prioritize moisture-wicking and don’t carry a phone, provided they choose darker colors to avoid see-through issues.
Best for Ultra-Short Style
Blooming Jelly 1.75"
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 1.75"
- Moisture-Wicking: Yes
- Pocket Design: 1 zip pocket
- Liner or Compression: Built-in brief
- Waistband Type: High waist
- Price: $$
Blooming Jelly’s 1.75" shorts offer a Lululemon-inspired silhouette, quick-dry fabric, and a zip pocket for small items. The ultrashort inseam suits petite runners, but size consistency varies by color, making it a gamble best taken by those who prioritize style over predictability.
Pros
- Lightweight, quick-dry fabric keeps you cool on hot runs.
- Flattering cut mimics high-end brands at a budget price.
Cons
- Color-to-color sizing inconsistency can require multiple tries to find the right fit.
A suitable pick for petite runners who value the Lululemon look over consistent sizing.
Best for No-Seam Comfort
Sunzel No-Seam
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 6"
- Moisture-Wicking: No
- Pocket Design: 2 side drop-in
- Liner or Compression: Compression (no liner)
- Waistband Type: High waist, tummy control
- Price: $
The no-front-seam design delivers impressive softness and eliminates camel toe, with side pockets that hold a phone securely. However, the thin nylon/spandex fabric can become sheer under stretch, and the waistband may roll down during movement — limitations that make these shorts a better fit for yoga or lounging than outdoor running.
Pros
- Buttery soft fabric with no front seam eliminates camel toe.
- Side pockets fit most phones securely.
Cons
- Fabric can be sheer when stretched, especially in bright outdoor light.
These shorts work well for yoga, lounging, or low-impact activities where softness and no camel toe matter more than opacity or waistband security.
Best for Loungewear
COLOSSEUM Cotton Blend
Key Features
- Inseam Length: Short
- Moisture-Wicking: No
- Waistband Type: Low rise
- Price: $
Soft and breathable cotton blend makes these shorts comfortable for lounging and low-impact yoga. The flattering cut and color options add casual appeal. However, the cotton fabric retains moisture, so they’re not suitable for running or sweaty workouts — a clear boundary for anyone seeking performance athletic wear.
Pros
- Extremely soft and comfortable for lounging
- Flattering appearance with many color options
Cons
- Cotton fabric holds sweat, making these unsuitable for running or high-sweat activities
A solid choice for lounging and light yoga, but skip these for any running or outdoor workout.
Best for Ultra-Short Pocket
BMJL 2.5"
Key Features
- Inseam Length: 2.5"
- Moisture-Wicking: Yes
- Pocket Design: 1 zip (backward)
- Liner or Compression: Built-in brief
- Waistband Type: High waist, elastic
- Price: $$
These shorts deliver a lightweight, quick-drying feel and a flattering high-waisted fit that stays in place. The 2.5" inseam is very short, suiting petite runners who prefer minimal coverage. However, the single zip pocket is sewn facing backward, making it nearly unusable for anything beyond a key or card – a design choice that limits functionality for those needing phone storage.
Pros
- Wide color selection with a flattering, stylish cut.
- Lightweight, quick-drying fabric ideal for sweaty runs.
Cons
- The single zip pocket is sewn backward, limiting storage to a key or card.
Best for runners who value a short, breezy cut and only need minimal pocket storage.
How to Choose
The most important decision when choosing running shorts is whether you prefer a compression biker fit or a traditional loose short with a built-in liner, because this choice determines everything from pocket placement to sweat management.
Inseam Length
Inseam length directly affects coverage and freedom of movement. Shorter inseams (1.5"–3") reduce fabric bulk and allow unrestricted stride, but they leave less thigh coverage and can ride up more easily, especially on women with thicker thighs.
Longer inseams (5"–8") provide more coverage and stability, but they can feel restrictive during high knee lifts and may bunch behind the knee. Tall runners over 5’7" generally need at least a 6" inseam to avoid a bikini-like appearance.
Moisture-Wicking Fabric
Moisture-wicking fabric pulls sweat away from skin and dries quickly, preventing chafing and discomfort. Polyester and nylon blends with moisture-wicking technology do this effectively, while cotton and cheap spandex absorb sweat and stay wet, leading to irritation.
Many budget biker shorts labeled ‘spandex’ lack any wicking treatment — they trap heat and moisture, making them better suited for low-sweat yoga than a 5K run. Look for terms like ‘quick-dry’, ‘Dri-FIT’, or ‘polyester blend’ to ensure performance.
Pocket Design and Security
Pocket design determines whether your phone stays put or bounces against your thigh. Open drop-in pockets are convenient but can let large phones bounce out during sprints. Zippered or deep compression pockets keep items secure but sometimes only fit keys and cards.
The trade-off is between accessibility and security. Runners who carry a phone should look for at least one zippered pocket or a drop-in pocket that’s deep enough to fully enclose the device. Pockets sewn backward (a surprisingly common flaw) are worse than no pocket at all.
Liner vs. Compression Fit
Built-in liners (briefs or compression shorts) provide modesty and prevent chafing between legs, eliminating the need for separate underwear. Loose outer shorts with liners are the traditional running style and offer better airflow.
Compression biker shorts act as both liner and outer layer, providing muscle support and tummy control. However, they trap more heat and can ride up if the leg hem isn’t grippy. Choose based on whether you prioritize ventilation (loose + liner) or support (compression).
Waistband Type
Waistband design affects whether shorts stay up during movement. High-waist, wide elastic bands with tummy control panels hold securely and prevent rolling, but they can feel restrictive around the midsection. Mid-rise elastic bands are less compressive but can slide down during high-impact runs.
Drawstring adjustments add insurance if your waist measurement falls between sizes. Some women find that ‘no roll’ waistbands with silicone grip strips stay put best, while simple elastic without drawstring tends to sag after repeated washing.
FAQ
Why do my running shorts keep riding up when I run?
Riding up usually happens because the leg opening is too tight or the fabric lacks grip. Compression shorts with a grippy silicone strip at the hem can prevent riding. Alternatively, a loose short with a built-in liner may stay in place better because the outer layer floats free.
Are biker shorts good for running or just for yoga?
Biker shorts can work for running if they have moisture-wicking fabric and enough opacity. Many budget biker shorts are made from thin spandex that traps sweat and becomes see-through during movement — those are better for yoga. Look for thick, squat-proof poly blends with a compressive waistband for running.
How tight should running shorts be to prevent chafing?
Running shorts should be snug enough to stay in place without digging in. Compression shorts should feel like a second skin with no loose fabric, but not so tight that they restrict movement or leave deep marks. For loose shorts, the waistband should stay put without needing constant pulling up.
Do women’s running shorts need a built-in liner?
A built-in liner provides modesty and prevents chafing by eliminating seams against the inner thigh. It also means you don’t need separate underwear, which can bunch up. If you prefer to wear your own sports underwear, look for unlined shorts — but expect more friction and potential chafing.